Skip to main content

Table 5 Sensitivity analysis for stratified Cox regression for the association of Statins use and risk of incident diabetes in participants without pre-diabetes (no Statins use as the reference, HR, 95%CI, P)

From: The use of statins are associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes in patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnoea, a longitudinal study

 

Crude model

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Men participants

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

0.91 (0.69,1.19), 0.481

0.86 (0.66,1.14), 0.291

0.84 (0.63,1.11), 0.216

0.85 (0.64,1.13), 0.257

Persistent use vs. no use

1.78 (1.27,2.50), 0.001

1.66 (1.18,2.34), 0.004

1.64 (1.15,2.34), 0.006

1.69 (1.17,2.44), 0.006

women participants

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

0.96 (0.62,1.50), 0.865

0.86 (0.54,1.35), 0.499

0.98 (0.62,1.58), 0.944

1.03 (0.63,1.70), 0.894

Persistent use vs. no use

1.42 (0.82,2.45), 0.213

1.26 (0.72,2.19), 0.420

1.51 (0.84,2.71), 0.165

1.61 (0.87,2.96), 0.129

age groups < 45years

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

1.11 (0.79,1.54), 0.548

1.04 (0.74,1.45), 0.824

1.00 (0.71,1.41), 0.981

1.23 (0.73,1.46), 0.878

Persistent use vs. no use

1.92 (1.07,3.44), 0.028

2.08 (1.16,3.73), 0.014

2.08 (1.14,3.82), 0.018

2.15 (1.15,4.01), 0.016

45-60years

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

0.70 (0.49,0.99), 0.046

0.64 (0.45,0.91), 0.014

0.64 (0.45,0.92), 0.017

0.65 (0.45,0.94), 0.023

Persistent use vs. no use

1.59 (1.05,2.40), 0.030

1.42 (0.94,2.16), 0.097

1.45 (0.95,2.22), 0.088

1.51 (0.98,2.31), 0.062

≥ 60years

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

1.08 (0.34,3.43), 0.897

1.35 (0.33,5.53), 0.675

1.58 (0.33,7.69), 0.570

1.54 (0.32,7.50), 0.594

Persistent use vs. no use

1.26 (0.38,4.16), 0.709

1.52 (0.36,6.42), 0.572

1.59 (0.32,7.85), 0.570

1.54 (0.31,7.63), 0.596

Non-obese participants

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

0.71 (0.28,1.78), 0.463

0.66 (0.26,1.66), 0.381

0.58 (0.22,1.52), 0.267

0.51 (0.19,1.40), 0.192

Persistent use vs. no use

1.26 (0.41,3.91), 0.691

1.26 (0.40,3.92), 0.692

1.01 (0.30,3.41), 0.983

0.96 (0.27,3.42), 0.946

Obese participants

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

0.92 (0.72,1.17), 0.493

0.85 (0.67,1.09), 0.201

0.84 (0.65,1.08), 0.170

0.86 (0.67,1.11), 0.254

Persistent use vs. no use

1.70 (1.25,2.30), 0.001

1.51 (1.11,2.05), 0.009

1.53 (1.12,2.10), 0.007

1.60 (1.16,2.22), 0.005

OSA severity groups, mild

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

1.08 (0.74,1.57), 0.708

1.03 (0.70,1.51), 0.884

1.08 (0.73,1.59), 0.701

1.07 (0.72,1.59), 0.747

Persistent use vs. no use

1.72 (1.04,2.84), 0.034

1.61 (0.97,2.66), 0.064

1.72 (1.03,2.88), 0.039

1.65 (0.97,2.84), 0.066

Moderate + severe

    

Intermittent use vs. no use

0.87 (0.64,1.19), 0.387

0.79 (0.58,1.08), 0.142

0.77 (0.56,1.07), 0.115

0.82 (0.59,1.14), 0.233

Persistent use vs. no use

1.55 (1.06,2.27), 0.025

1.40 (0.96,2.06), 0.084

1.40 (0.94,2.09), 0.098

1.53 (1.01,2.32), 0.047

  1. Model 1: adjusted for fasting blood glucose; model 2: adjusted for HTN duration + Abdominal circumference + Alanine aminotransferase + Uric acid + Systolic blood pressure + Triglyceride + High density lipoprotein-C + model 1; model 3: adjusted for age + gender + anti-HTN agents + model 1