Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 GRADE evidence profile

From: Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Outcome

No. of studies

Study Design

No. of participants

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Publication bias

Plausible confounding

Magnitude of effect

Dose-response gradient

Quality

Primary Composite Outcome

8

RCT

60,080

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

no serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

High

Cardiovascular Death

9

RCT

63,613

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

no serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

High

All-Cause Death

9

RCT

63,613

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

no serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

High

Myocardial Infarction

9

RCT

63,613

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

no serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

High

HF Hospitalization

9

RCT

63,613

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

no serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

High

Stroke

9

RCT

63,613

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

no serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

High

UA Hospitalization

7

RCT

50,617

no serious risk

no serious inconsistency

no serious

indirectness

serious

imprecision

undetected

would not reduce effect

no

no

Moderate

  1. NO., number; HF, heart failure; UA, unstable angina